Broker
Dexsport
What the Dutch user sees at the door
Account opening on Dexsport does not run through iDEAL, a Dutch bank transfer, or an identity check with a local bank. Entry is anonymous via Web3 wallets, and the operator does not require KYC at that stage. That single design choice changes the shape of the relationship: there is no Dutch bank in the loop, no Dutch IBAN tied to the trading account, and no Dutch entity on the other side of the contract. The counterparty is Dexapp LTD, operating under an Anjouan licence. Anjouan is an offshore jurisdiction, not a European supervisory authority. A Dutch reader comparing this to a platform supervised by the AFM or holding a MiFID passport is comparing two different regulatory situations, and the difference is not cosmetic — it determines which authority a complaint can be addressed to and which rules apply to the operator.The licence, read plainly
| Item | Value | |---|---| | Operating entity | Dexapp LTD | | Licence | Anjouan licence | | KYC at entry | Not required — anonymous entry via Web3 wallets | | Coins supported | 85+ across 20+ blockchains | | Account model | Web3 wallet, not a bank-linked account | The licence is real in the sense that it exists and is issued to a named company. What it is not is a Dutch or EU licence. For a reader in the Netherlands, that means the platform sits outside the supervisory perimeter they would normally expect when dealing with a financial service. The facts do not state which activities the Anjouan licence covers, so the scope should be checked directly with the operator before relying on it.85+ coins across 20+ blockchains
The asset list is broad by count: 85+ coins across 20+ blockchains. For someone used to a Dutch broker offering a curated set of instruments on a single venue, the structure is different — assets are spread across multiple chains, which has consequences for how deposits and withdrawals are routed. The facts do not name which chains or which coins. That matters for a Dutch user because the practical questions — which network to use, what the withdrawal path looks like, whether a given token is available — depend on that list, and it is not in the source material here. The count is the only claim that can be made; the composition has to be verified on the platform itself.Where the Dutch banking layer is absent
A Dutch reader's mental model of moving money involves a bank, a payment rail, and a paper trail that a tax adviser or the Belastingdienst can follow. Dexsport's entry model bypasses the first two. Funds arrive from a Web3 wallet, not from a Dutch bank account, and the platform does not perform KYC at entry. That does not remove the user's own obligations. Dutch tax rules apply to the resident, not to the platform, and the platform's anonymity at entry does not change what a Dutch resident owes on their holdings or activity. The facts here say nothing about reporting, so the point is simply that the absence of KYC on the platform side is not the same as the absence of rules on the user side.What to check before committing
Three things follow directly from the facts. First, confirm the scope of the Anjouan licence held by Dexapp LTD — what it authorises and what it does not. Second, confirm the specific chains and coins behind the 85+ / 20+ figures, since deposit and withdrawal routes depend on them. Third, decide in advance how the wallet-based, non-KYC account fits with your own record-keeping, because the platform will not produce the kind of statement a Dutch bank would. None of these are reasons to avoid the platform or to use it. They are the questions that the facts leave open, and they are the ones a Dutch reader should be able to answer before treating Dexsport as a place to hold or trade anything of value.If the table above settled it for you, open an account and read the platform's own terms first: rankings compare what is published, not what happens to your money.
Trading conditions